| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2017 Chevrolet SS and 2012 Toyota Highlander Specifications
| Model Year | 2017 | 2012 | |
| Model | Chevrolet SS | Toyota Highlander | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,916 mm | 2,789 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,966 mm | 4,785 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,897 mm | 1,910 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,471 mm | 1,730 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,813 kg | 1,790 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 71 L | 73 L | -2 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 983 mm | 1,031 mm | 982 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,501 mm | 1,516 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,453 mm | 1,440 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,074 mm | 1,097 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 965 mm | 1,019 mm | 964 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,499 mm | 1,511 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,473 mm | 1,435 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,008 mm | 973 mm | -972 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 922 mm | -922 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,397 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,074 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 742 mm | -742 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,083 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,812 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 464 L | 292 L | 172 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 16.4 | 1,198 L | 15.4 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 16.4 | 2,701 L | 14.4 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Chevrolet SS
| 2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger. see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering. see full Chevrolet SS review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Toyota Highlander
| 2012 Toyota Highlander Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Perfect for two car seats. Really neat trick - the middle seat for the 2nd row rolls up into the center console. I did not remove it nor attempt to sit in it but that does make the 3rd row more likely to be used for those with car seats. I did not attempt to sit in the 3rd row (looked at it before folding into the floor for cargo space for the entire trip) so cannot opine on it. Use at your own risk. see full Toyota Highlander review |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
I am 6 foot tall, and there is plenty of head and leg room in the driving position. Easy access as well. see full Toyota Highlander review |
| 2012 Toyota Highlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
3rd row seats are useless to me. Too little room for adults. Should have been an option for families with small children. With 3rd row seating, you lose storage space. see full Toyota Highlander review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6 Hybrid CVT AWD |
Third row minimal legroom see full Toyota Highlander review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
