| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2017 Chevrolet SS and 2011 Toyota Matrix Specifications
| Model Year | 2017 | 2011 | |
| Model | Chevrolet SS | Toyota Matrix | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 114.8 in | 102.4 in | 12.4 in |
| Length | 195.5 in | 171.9 in | 23.6 in |
| Width | 74.7 in | 69.5 in | 5.2 in |
| Height | 57.9 in | 61.4 in | -3.5 in |
| Curb Weight | 3997 lb. | 2865 lb. | 1132 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 18.8 gal. | 13.2 gal. | 5.6 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.7 in | 40.5 in | -1.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 59.1 in | 53.3 in | 5.8 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 57.2 in | 52.3 in | 4.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.3 in | 41.6 in | 0.7 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.0 in | 39.3 in | -1.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 59.0 in | 52.6 in | 6.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 58.0 in | 43.7 in | 14.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 39.7 in | 36.2 in | 3.5 in |
| Total Legroom | 82 in (over 2 rows) | 77.8 in (over 2 rows) | 4.2 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 16.4 ft3 | 19.8 ft3 | -3.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 16.4 ft3 | 61.5 ft3 | -45.1 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Chevrolet SS
| 2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger. see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering. see full Chevrolet SS review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Toyota Matrix
| 2011 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat for a tall large guy is terrible this is why i got a BMW instead 2 years ago, my wife is using the Toyota see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2011 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
The front seat is not rally confortable for a big 6foot 300 pound guy. I have long torso and some time get back pain in the middle after long driving... see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat are horrible for an "high end" class (XRS) car ...
I considered getting rid of the car due to back pain, but my wife is using it now, I got a BMW
see full Toyota Matrix review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
