Chevrolet SS vs. Toyota Sequoia MPG

Chart is based on 11 fuel economy reports for the Chevrolet SS and 36 fuel economy reports for the Toyota Sequoia.

Chevrolet SS MPG

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	MPG
2017	4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	med	light	0	0	50	50	70	16.8

This page shows only averages. See all the Chevrolet SS fuel economy data.

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	MPG
2008	4dr SUV 381-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	med	hvy	3	13	7	77	75	16.3
2008	4dr SUV 381-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD w/low range	flat	light	light	12	20	28	40	68	15.7
2007	4dr SUV 273-horsepower 4.7L V8 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	med	light	20	37	25	18	69	12.7
2007	4dr SUV 273-horsepower 4.7L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range	flat	med	hvy	0	40	60	0	0	14.8
2005	4dr SUV 282-horsepower 4.7L V8 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	med	none	8	20	43	30	70	15.7
2005	4dr SUV 282-horsepower 4.7L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range	flat	light	light	0	5	80	15	70	16.0
2004	4dr SUV 240-horsepower 4.7L V8 4-speed automatic RWD	flat	light	light	25	10	50	15	63	17.0
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2003	4dr SUV 240-horsepower 4.7L V8 4-speed automatic RWD	flat	med	hvy	50	40	0	10	70	13.9
2003	4dr SUV 240-horsepower 4.7L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range	flat	light	light	3	8	30	59	68	17.4
2002	4dr SUV 240-horsepower 4.7L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range	hills	lead	hvy	10	10	30	50	65	15.4
2001	4dr SUV 240-horsepower 4.7L V8 4-speed automatic RWD	flat	med	hvy	23	25	23	30	60	15.0

This page shows only averages. See all the Toyota Sequoia fuel economy data.

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans

See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models and Toyota models.

Chevrolet SS Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Comment
	My mention of a $1,300 gas guzzler tax foreshadowed this "why not." If you want a fuel-efficient car, you probably don't want a big, V8-powered sedan. But even compared to the Dodge Charger R/T the SS is a guzzler. This is partly because the very small number sold doesn't justify an upgrade to GM's latest engine and transmission technology, which includes variable valve timing, cylinder deactivation, and eight-speed automatic transmissions. These technologies enable the Charger R/T to earn EPA ratings of 16 mpg city, 25 mpg highway, while the SS can only manage 14/21 with a six-speed automatic or 15/21 with a six-speed manual (which skips from first to fourth under light throttle). In my real-world driving, the trip computer usually reported an average around 16 or 17 in the suburbs (20 if I drove with a very light foot) and MAYBE 24 on the highway. The trip computer in the Dodge reported averages that were usually higher by a couple MPG, but keep its engine in V4 mode (i.e. no lights to stop for) and the average can reach 30. see full Chevrolet SS review

Chevrolet SS Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2017	4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD	Wow, really, really bad. All the reviews you may have read about the fuel economy are dead on. You can optimistically get 24 on the freeway and low teens city. Then again you are NOT buying this car for fuel economy. see full Chevrolet SS review

Toyota Sequoia Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2005	4dr SUV 282-horsepower 4.7L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range	Overall average 16mpg, not bad for SUV but definitly needs improved. see full Toyota Sequoia review