Chevrolet SS (2014) vs. Toyota Sienna (2016) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2014 Chevrolet SS and 2016 Toyota Sienna specs.
2014 Chevrolet SS and 2016 Toyota Sienna Specifications
| Model Year |
2014 |
2016 |
|
| Model |
Chevrolet SS |
Toyota Sienna |
|
| Engine |
|
|
|
| Transmission |
|
|
|
| Drivetrain |
|
|
|
| Body |
4dr Sedan |
4dr Minivan, ext. |
|
| |
|
|
Difference |
| Wheelbase |
2,916 mm |
3,030 mm |
-1 mm |
| Length |
4,966 mm |
5,085 mm |
-1 mm |
| Width |
1,897 mm |
1,984 mm |
0 mm |
| Height |
1,471 mm |
1,750 mm |
0 mm |
| Curb Weight |
1,803 kg |
1,955 kg |
0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity |
72 L |
76 L |
-4 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 |
983 mm |
1,041 mm |
982 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
1,501 mm |
1,651 mm |
0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 |
1,453 mm |
1,488 mm |
0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 |
1,074 mm |
1,029 mm |
0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 |
965 mm |
1,008 mm |
964 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
1,499 mm |
1,641 mm |
0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 |
1,473 mm |
1,679 mm |
0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 |
1,008 mm |
955 mm |
-954 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 |
0 mm |
973 mm |
-973 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 |
0 mm |
1,552 mm |
-1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 |
0 mm |
1,278 mm |
-1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 |
0 mm |
922 mm |
-922 mm |
| Total Legroom |
2,083 mm (over 2 rows) |
2,906 mm (over 3 rows) |
0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum |
464 L |
1,107 L |
463 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 |
16.4 |
2,466 L |
14.4 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum |
16.4 |
4,248 L |
12.4 |
Return to top
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet SS
| 2015 |
Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat.
Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2014 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Comment |
|
The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet SS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet SS.
Be the first!
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Toyota Sienna
| 2015 |
The Sienna's seats are cushier than those in the Odyssey or the Sedona. But I slightly preferred the Sedona's front seats because they had four-way lumbar (rather than two-way) and provided more lateral support.
The Toyota earns a clear win in front seat space. The first-row foot wells are unusually wide, and there's no tall center console (as in the Kia) or a protruding center stack (as in the Honda) to crowd the driver's right elbow or knee. This said, a relatively tall instrument panel does cut into the view forward and contribute to the Sienna feeling larger than the others.
see full Toyota Sienna review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Toyota Sienna
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Toyota Sienna.
Be the first!
See TrueDelta's information for all
SedansSee TrueDelta's information for all
Chevrolet models.
