MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Chevrolet SS vs. Toyota Solara Fuel Economy (km/L)

Chart is based on 11 fuel economy reports for the Chevrolet SS and 27 fuel economy reports for the Toyota Solara.

Chevrolet SS km/L

Chevrolet SS Chevrolet SS 2017 39.4 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd km/L
2017 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 flat med light 0 0 50 50 70 39.4  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Chevrolet SS fuel economy data.

Toyota Solara km/L

Toyota Solara Toyota Solara 2007 75.0 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Toyota Solara Toyota Solara 2006 57.0 MPG Highway Percentage 49 percent Toyota Solara Toyota Solara 2006 74.0 MPG Highway Percentage 72 percent Toyota Solara Toyota Solara 2006 58.1 MPG Highway Percentage 38 percent Toyota Solara Toyota Solara 2005 61.2 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Toyota Solara Toyota Solara 2004 55.3 MPG Highway Percentage 42 percent Toyota Solara Toyota Solara 2001 35.3 MPG Highway Percentage 5 percent Toyota Solara Toyota Solara 2001 63.5 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Toyota Solara Toyota Solara 2000 65.9 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd km/L
2007 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 3.3L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat v.lt none 0 5 20 75 65 75.0  
2006 2dr Coupe 225-horsepower 3.3L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat light light 17 21 14 49 63 57.0  
2006 2dr Coupe 157-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 hills med none 14 7 7 72 73 74.0  
2006 2dr Convertible 225-horsepower 3.3L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat med light 4 19 39 38 69 58.1  
2005 2dr Coupe 157-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 hills med none 10 35 35 20 75 61.2  
2004 2dr Coupe 225-horsepower 3.3L V6
5-speed automatic FWD		 flat med light 6 14 38 42 70 55.3  
2001 2dr Coupe 200-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat light hvy 5 75 15 5 75 35.3  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2001 2dr Convertible 157-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat light light 0 0 25 75 70 63.5  
2000 2dr Convertible 200-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic FWD		 hills light light 24 22 24 30 60 65.9  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Toyota Solara fuel economy data.

Chevrolet SS vs. Toyota Solara Fuel Economy (km/L)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Chevrolet SS and Toyota Solara's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world km/L based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models and Toyota models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Chevrolet SS

Chevrolet SS Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearComment
My mention of a $1,300 gas guzzler tax foreshadowed this "why not." If you want a fuel-efficient car, you probably don't want a big, V8-powered sedan. But even compared to the Dodge Charger R/T the SS is a guzzler. This is partly because the very small number sold doesn't justify an upgrade to GM's latest engine and transmission technology, which includes variable valve timing, cylinder deactivation, and eight-speed automatic transmissions. These technologies enable the Charger R/T to earn EPA ratings of 16 mpg city, 25 mpg highway, while the SS can only manage 14/21 with a six-speed automatic or 15/21 with a six-speed manual (which skips from first to fourth under light throttle). In my real-world driving, the trip computer usually reported an average around 16 or 17 in the suburbs (20 if I drove with a very light foot) and MAYBE 24 on the highway. The trip computer in the Dodge reported averages that were usually higher by a couple MPG, but keep its engine in V4 mode (i.e. no lights to stop for) and the average can reach 30. see full Chevrolet SS review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Chevrolet SS

Chevrolet SS Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2017 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed manual RWD		 Wow, really, really bad. All the reviews you may have read about the fuel economy are dead on. You can optimistically get 24 on the freeway and low teens city. Then again you are NOT buying this car for fuel economy. see full Chevrolet SS review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Toyota Solara

Toyota Solara Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 2dr Convertible 210-horsepower 3.3L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 I was continually impressed that, given reasonably conservative driving, this torquey 3.3L V6 returned fuel economy in the high 20s and even touched the 30s on a long drive from Phoenix to San Diego. see full Toyota Solara review
2006 2dr Coupe 157-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 I keep getting above EPA estimates. City/Highway/Combined at 26/35/32 see full Toyota Solara review
2006 2dr Convertible 225-horsepower 3.3L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 I get great fuel ecomony: 25-29 mpg combination of highway and city driving. see full Toyota Solara review
2004 2dr Convertible 225-horsepower 3.3L V6
5-speed automatic FWD		 Increased distance between gas stops. see full Toyota Solara review