| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Chevrolet Spark and 2006 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2006 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Spark | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 93.5 in | 107.1 in | -13.6 in |
| Length | 144.7 in | 187.6 in | -42.9 in |
| Width | 62.9 in | 73.9 in | -11 in |
| Height | 61.0 in | 55.4 in | 5.6 in |
| Curb Weight | 2269 lb. | 3373 lb. | -1104 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 9.2 gal. | 16.0 gal. | -6.8 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.4 in | 38.6 in | 0.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 50.7 in | 55.4 in | -4.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 48.0 in | 53.6 in | -5.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.0 in | 42.7 in | -0.7 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.3 in | 34.7 in | 2.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 49.7 in | 53.4 in | -3.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 47.5 in | 46.8 in | 0.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 35.2 in | 30.3 in | 4.9 in |
| Total Legroom | 77.2 in (over 2 rows) | 73 in (over 2 rows) | 4.2 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 11.4 ft3 | 13.1 ft3 | -1.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 31.2 ft3 | 13.1 ft3 | 18.1 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet Spark
| 2014 Chevrolet Spark Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | Actually, just room. The firm, thinly padded rear seat provides minimal comfort. But there's more rear legroom than in quite a few larger cars. A Ford Focus, two size classes up, offers two fewer inches. Chevrolet's own Cruze offers just a few tenths of a inch more. see full Chevrolet Spark review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet Spark
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet Spark.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Ford Mustang
| 2006 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
seat is comfortable can be adjusted to suit your choice of position all controls are within easy reach see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Driving position is very flexible, all the controls are within reach and easy to use. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Plenty of leg room for tall people like me. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2006 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
While our present government may blow off the standards & principles of the Geneva Convention, I still find them worthy enough to abide. Mustang rear seats are in clear violation. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
The Mustang is a cool car, but nowhere near as comfortable see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
Not much room in the back of a Mustang... see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is small for adults. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
Rear seat is for kids. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
Rear seats in name only. No real passenger room see full Ford Mustang review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
