| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban and 2013 Ford C-MAX Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2013 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | Ford C-MAX | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 116.0 in | 104.3 in | 11.7 in |
| Length | 198.8 in | 173.6 in | 25.2 in |
| Width | 78.8 in | 72.0 in | 6.8 in |
| Height | 74.8 in | 63.9 in | 10.9 in |
| Curb Weight | 5028 lb. | 3607 lb. | 1421 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 26.0 gal. | 13.5 gal. | 12.5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.7 in | 41.0 in | -0.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 65.2 in | 55.9 in | 9.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 61.4 in | 54.3 in | 7.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 40.4 in | 0.9 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.4 in | 39.4 in | 0 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 65.1 in | 55.2 in | 9.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 61.3 in | 51.9 in | 9.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 38.6 in | 36.5 in | 2.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 37.4 in | 0.0 in | 37.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 64.4 in | 0.0 in | 64.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 49.0 in | 0.0 in | 49 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 27.3 in | 0.0 in | 27.3 in |
| Total Legroom | 107.2 in (over 3 rows) | 76.9 in (over 2 rows) | 30.3 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 16.3 ft3 | 24.5 ft3 | -8.2 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 63.6 ft3 | 24.5 | 39.1 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 104.6 ft3 | 52.6 ft3 | 52 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
| 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
like riding first class in an airplane see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
There is plenty of space for all of the passengers and personal gear. The bucket seats add a lot of comfort. They also allow some extra room for third row passengers. Leather is the way to go, and the heated seats come in handy on those cold winter days. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic RWD |
the best! had a back operation three years ago and this was thed only vehicle i am comfortable in see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 295-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
GMT800 series vehicles fit me better than any other. I prefer the '06 Tahoe to the '09 GMC Sierra i had prior to the Equinox i traded for the Tahoe. The Equinox was okay on a straight road, other than that, it was terrible! No lateral support at see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
| 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic RWD |
inability to flat fold seat see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford C-MAX
| 2013 Ford C-MAX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's plenty of space for adults in the back seat of the C-MAX. But the seat is mounted too low to provide thigh support, and between this and the angle of the floor I could find no comfortable way to position my legs and feet. There's a huge amount of headroom, so this was not the limiting factor. Instead, the seat seems to be so low to enable a flat floor when it is folded without requiring that the seat bottom be folded separately from the seat back. Combine the low seat with a high beltline (bottom of the side windows), and children can't see out well. see full Ford C-MAX review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford C-MAX
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Ford C-MAX.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
