

Model Year | 2010 | 2013 | |
Model | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | Ford C-MAX | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 116.0 in | 104.3 in | 11.7 in |
Length | 202.0 in | 173.6 in | 28.4 in |
Width | 79.0 in | 72.0 in | 7 in |
Height | 76.9 in | 63.9 in | 13 in |
Curb Weight | 5636 lb. | 3607 lb. | 2029 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 26.0 gal. | 13.5 gal. | 12.5 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 41.1 in | 41.0 in | 0.1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 65.3 in | 55.9 in | 9.4 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 64.4 in | 54.3 in | 10.1 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 40.4 in | 0.9 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 39.2 in | 39.4 in | -0.2 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 65.2 in | 55.2 in | 10 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 60.6 in | 51.9 in | 8.7 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 39.0 in | 36.5 in | 2.5 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 37.9 in | 0.0 in | 37.9 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 61.7 in | 0.0 in | 61.7 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 49.1 in | 0.0 in | 49.1 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 25.6 in | 0.0 in | 25.6 in |
Total Legroom | 105.9 in (over 3 rows) | 76.9 in (over 2 rows) | 29 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 16.9 ft3 | 24.5 ft3 | -7.6 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 60.3 ft3 | 24.5 | 35.8 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 108.9 ft3 | 52.6 ft3 | 56.3 ft3 |
2010 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2010 | 4dr SUV, ext. 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD w/low range |
I drive about a 1000 miles a week. After driving the Suburban for 2 months, my back problems have gone away. Feel fresh after a 3 hour drive see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
2010 | 4dr SUV, ext. 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD w/low range |
Family and cargo fit comfortably see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
2013 Ford C-MAX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
There's plenty of space for adults in the back seat of the C-MAX. But the seat is mounted too low to provide thigh support, and between this and the angle of the floor I could find no comfortable way to position my legs and feet. There's a huge amount of headroom, so this was not the limiting factor. Instead, the seat seems to be so low to enable a flat floor when it is folded without requiring that the seat bottom be folded separately from the seat back. Combine the low seat with a high beltline (bottom of the side windows), and children can't see out well. see full Ford C-MAX review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Ford C-MAX.