| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2020 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban and 2016 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2020 | 2016 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,946 mm | 2,720 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 5,182 mm | 4,783 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 2,045 mm | 1,915 mm | 1 mm |
| Height | 1,890 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,479 kg | 1,599 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 98 L | 61 L | 37 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,087 mm | 955 mm | -954 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,646 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,544 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,151 mm | 1,067 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 983 mm | 884 mm | 99 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,654 mm | 1,326 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,532 mm | 1,204 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 777 mm | 214 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 968 mm | 0 mm | 968 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,590 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,252 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 630 mm | 0 mm | 630 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,771 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 433 L | 382 L | 51 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,461 L | 13.5 | -12.5 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,682 L | 13.5 | -11.5 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2020 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
