Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban (2002) vs. Toyota Corolla (2013) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban and 2013 Toyota Corolla specs.
2002 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban and 2013 Toyota Corolla Specifications
Model Year |
2002 |
2013 |
|
Model |
Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban |
Toyota Corolla |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Total Legroom |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
2002 |
4dr SUV, ext. 285-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Great room and comfort for family of 6. Only vechile in this category in 2002 when purchased. 10 years later still in good shape, and happy with vehicle. Would have considered Ford Expedition EL if had been available.
see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Toyota Corolla
2014 |
The Corolla's specs indicate rear legroom worthy of a large sedan, 41.3 inches, a substantial four more than in the Sentra and five more than in last year's Corolla. To provide this increase, Toyota stretched the car's wheelbase by four inches, taking it from the shortest in the segment to the 106.3-inch dimension shared by the Hyundai, Kia, Mazda, and Nissan. The Ford Focus, with a 104.3-inch wheelbase, is now the briefest of the bunch. The Corolla's overall length has also grown by four inches, to 182.6.
Subjectively, the Corolla's advantage over the Sentra seems about half as large. Still a lot of legroom for a compact, especially in conjunction with a more comfortably positioned seat. Rear seat headroom is in much shorter supply in both cars.
see full Toyota Corolla review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Toyota Corolla
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all
Chevrolet models.