| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2002 Chevrolet Tracker and 2011 Volkswagen Eos Specifications
| Model Year | 2002 | 2011 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Tracker | Volkswagen Eos | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2002 Chevrolet Tracker
| 2002 Chevrolet Tracker Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2003 | 4dr SUV 165-horsepower 2.5L V6 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
very tight for bigger people see full Chevrolet Tracker review |
| 2003 | 4dr SUV 165-horsepower 2.5L V6 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
small seat, crampted see full Chevrolet Tracker review |
| 2003 | 4dr SUV 165-horsepower 2.5L V6 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
limited legroom see full Chevrolet Tracker review |
| 2003 | 4dr SUV 127-horsepower 2.0L I4 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Its abit small for adults, or large car seats. see full Chevrolet Tracker review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Volkswagen Eos
| 2011 Volkswagen Eos Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD |
The back seat is not comfortable and has limited leg room. While the latter may be typical of some convertibles, leg room is less than on previous convertibles I have owned. see full Volkswagen Eos review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
