Model Year | 2006 | 2016 | |
Model | Chevrolet TrailBlazer | Ford Mustang | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,870 mm | 2,720 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,872 mm | 4,783 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,897 mm | 1,915 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,842 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,004 kg | 1,599 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 83 L | 61 L | 22 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,021 mm | 955 mm | -954 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,486 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,422 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,090 mm | 1,067 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,006 mm | 884 mm | -883 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,486 mm | 1,326 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,478 mm | 1,204 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 940 mm | 777 mm | 163 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,029 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 1,237 L | 382 L | -381 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,268 L | 13.5 | -11.5 L |
2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr SUV 291-horsepower 4.2L I6 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Excellent Front Seats see full Chevrolet TrailBlazer review |
2007 | 4dr SUV 291-horsepower 4.2L I6 4-speed automatic RWD |
I am tall (6'6") and fit in the front seats and am able to drive it. That is rare and good. Comfort is high for a GM product. see full Chevrolet TrailBlazer review |
2006 | 4dr SUV 291-horsepower 4.2L I6 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
The best front seats for cruising and around town comfort. Love the individual memory settings and adjustment range of the power controls. see full Chevrolet TrailBlazer review |
2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2006 | 4dr SUV 291-horsepower 4.2L I6 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Far too cramped getting in and out of the rear seating. see full Chevrolet TrailBlazer review |
2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.