Model Year | 2011 | 2013 | |
Model | Chevrolet Traverse | Ford Mustang | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 3,020 mm | 2,720 mm | 1 mm |
Length | 5,207 mm | 4,788 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 1,991 mm | 1,877 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,788 mm | 1,417 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,173 kg | 1,588 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 83 L | 61 L | 22 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 978 mm | -977 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,575 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,501 mm | 1,356 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,077 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,001 mm | 881 mm | -880 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,557 mm | 1,214 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,468 mm | 1,189 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 757 mm | 178 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 960 mm | 0 mm | 960 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,463 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,227 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 843 mm | 0 mm | 843 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,827 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,834 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 691 L | 379 L | 312 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,948 L | 13.4 | -12.4 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,296 L | 13.4 | -10.4 L |
2011 Chevrolet Traverse Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 4dr SUV 281-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Although the rear captain seats are quite comfortable, I do not like how they roll forward. There is a track in the floor in which the rear seats fold and slide up behind the front seats. All I notice when in the back seat is how extremely difficult it is to clean out the mud and grit and salt (I live in Canada, we use salt on our roads) that gets left behind in the track from passenger footwear. see full Chevrolet Traverse review |
2011 | 4dr SUV 281-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The headrest position is horrible for long trips. Felt like my head was being pushed forward. see full Chevrolet Traverse review |
2013 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
2013 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
My dad's 2010 Camaro has much more legroom than my Mustang. 2 more inches would help a lot, though I have to admit even at 6-3, I'm still pretty comfy in the Mustang. The room would be nice to have on trips. see full Ford Mustang review |