Model Year | 2012 | 2006 | |
Model | Chevrolet Traverse | Ford Mustang | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 3,020 mm | 2,720 mm | 1 mm |
Length | 5,207 mm | 4,765 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 1,991 mm | 1,877 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,788 mm | 1,407 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,173 kg | 1,530 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 83 L | 61 L | 22 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 980 mm | -979 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,575 mm | 1,407 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,501 mm | 1,361 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,085 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,001 mm | 881 mm | -880 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,557 mm | 1,356 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,468 mm | 1,189 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 770 mm | 165 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 960 mm | 0 mm | 960 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,463 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,227 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 843 mm | 0 mm | 843 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,827 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,854 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 691 L | 371 L | 320 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,948 L | 13.1 | -12.1 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,296 L | 13.1 | -10.1 L |
2012 Chevrolet Traverse Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 4dr SUV 281-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Although the rear captain seats are quite comfortable, I do not like how they roll forward. There is a track in the floor in which the rear seats fold and slide up behind the front seats. All I notice when in the back seat is how extremely difficult it is to clean out the mud and grit and salt (I live in Canada, we use salt on our roads) that gets left behind in the track from passenger footwear. see full Chevrolet Traverse review |
2011 | 4dr SUV 281-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The headrest position is horrible for long trips. Felt like my head was being pushed forward. see full Chevrolet Traverse review |
2006 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2006 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
seat is comfortable can be adjusted to suit your choice of position all controls are within easy reach see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Convertible 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Driving position is very flexible, all the controls are within reach and easy to use. see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Plenty of leg room for tall people like me. see full Ford Mustang review |
2006 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
While our present government may blow off the standards & principles of the Geneva Convention, I still find them worthy enough to abide. Mustang rear seats are in clear violation. see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
The Mustang is a cool car, but nowhere near as comfortable see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
Not much room in the back of a Mustang... see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is small for adults. see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
Rear seat is for kids. see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
Rear seats in name only. No real passenger room see full Ford Mustang review |