| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Chevrolet Traverse and 2012 Honda Fit Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2012 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Traverse | Honda Fit | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 118.9 in | 98.4 in | 20.5 in |
| Length | 205.0 in | 161.6 in | 43.4 in |
| Width | 78.4 in | 66.7 in | 11.7 in |
| Height | 70.4 in | 60.0 in | 10.4 in |
| Curb Weight | 4790 lb. | 2496 lb. | 2294 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 22.0 gal. | 10.6 gal. | 11.4 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.4 in | 40.4 in | 0 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 62.0 in | 52.7 in | 9.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 59.1 in | 51.5 in | 7.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 41.3 in | 0 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.4 in | 39.0 in | 0.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 61.3 in | 51.3 in | 10 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 57.8 in | 51.3 in | 6.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 36.8 in | 34.5 in | 2.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 37.8 in | 0.0 in | 37.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 57.6 in | 0.0 in | 57.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 48.3 in | 0.0 in | 48.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 33.2 in | 0.0 in | 33.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 111.3 in (over 3 rows) | 75.8 in (over 2 rows) | 35.5 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 24.4 ft3 | 20.6 ft3 | 3.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 68.8 ft3 | 20.6 | 48.2 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 116.4 ft3 | 57.3 ft3 | 59.1 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Chevrolet Traverse
| 2010 Chevrolet Traverse Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 281-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The headrest position is horrible for long trips. Felt like my head was being pushed forward. see full Chevrolet Traverse review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda Fit
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
