| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Chevrolet Traverse and 2012 Honda Fit Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2012 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Traverse | Honda Fit | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,020 mm | 2,499 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,207 mm | 4,105 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,991 mm | 1,694 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,788 mm | 1,524 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,173 kg | 1,132 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 83 L | 40 L | 43 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 1,026 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,575 mm | 1,339 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,501 mm | 1,308 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,049 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,001 mm | 991 mm | -990 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,557 mm | 1,303 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,468 mm | 1,303 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 876 mm | 59 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 960 mm | 0 mm | 960 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,463 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,227 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 843 mm | 0 mm | 843 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,827 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,925 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 691 L | 583 L | 108 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,948 L | 20.6 | -19.6 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,296 L | 1,623 L | 2 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Chevrolet Traverse
| 2010 Chevrolet Traverse Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 281-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The headrest position is horrible for long trips. Felt like my head was being pushed forward. see full Chevrolet Traverse review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda Fit
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
