| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Chevrolet Traverse and 2016 Honda Fit Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2016 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Traverse | Honda Fit | |
| Engine | 3.6L V6 DOHC-4v 210 kW@6300 361 Nm@3400 |
1.5L I4 OHC-4v 97 kW@6600 155 Nm@4600 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | CVT | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,020 mm | 2,530 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,207 mm | 4,064 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,991 mm | 1,702 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,788 mm | 1,524 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,173 kg | 1,154 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 83 L | 40 L | 43 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 1,003 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,575 mm | 1,392 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,501 mm | 1,308 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,052 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,001 mm | 953 mm | -952 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,557 mm | 1,336 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,468 mm | 1,146 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 998 mm | -63 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 960 mm | 0 mm | 960 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,463 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,227 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 843 mm | 0 mm | 843 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,827 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,050 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 691 L | 470 L | 221 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,948 L | 16.6 | -15.6 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,296 L | 1,492 L | 2 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Chevrolet Traverse
| 2010 Chevrolet Traverse Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 281-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The headrest position is horrible for long trips. Felt like my head was being pushed forward. see full Chevrolet Traverse review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Honda Fit
| 2016 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The new Honda Fit's first row has a a few more inches of elbow room than those in the Versa Note and Fiesta. Consequently, it feels like a larger car--unless you also need leg room. Then it's no better than the Nissan. Drivers with long legs will wish the front seat could slide back farther--but this would cramp the magic style of the rear seat. Even drivers of middling height (e.g. me) might find the driver seat uncomfortable. The headrest and non-adjustable lumbar bulge both jut well forward. Depending on your personal size and shape, this might or might not be an issue. Pay close attention before you buy. see full Honda Fit review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Honda Fit
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Honda Fit.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
