| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Chevrolet Traverse and 2017 Honda Pilot Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2017 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Traverse | Honda Pilot | |
| Engine | 3.6L V6 DOHC-4v 215 kW@6300 366 Nm@3400 |
3.5L V6 OHC-4v 209 kW@6000 355 Nm@4700 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,020 mm | 2,819 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,207 mm | 4,940 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,991 mm | 1,996 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,788 mm | 1,773 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,298 kg | 1,919 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 83 L | 74 L | 9 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 1,019 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,575 mm | 1,575 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,501 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,001 mm | 1,021 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,557 mm | 1,575 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,468 mm | 1,455 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 975 mm | -40 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 960 mm | 988 mm | -28 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,463 mm | 1,463 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,227 mm | 1,133 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 843 mm | 810 mm | 33 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,827 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,824 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 691 L | 467 L | 224 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,948 L | 1,325 L | 0 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,296 L | 2,376 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Chevrolet Traverse
| 2010 Chevrolet Traverse Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 281-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The headrest position is horrible for long trips. Felt like my head was being pushed forward. see full Chevrolet Traverse review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Honda Pilot
| 2017 Honda Pilot Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | According to their spec sheets, the Ford Explorer and Nissan Pathfinder have more rear legroom than the new Honda Pilot. In practice, though, the Pilot's rear legroom feels at least as generous as theirs--I suspect some creative measuring--and well ahead of what you'll find in a Toyota Highlander. The Pilot's second-row seat isn't as high off the floor as the Ford Explorer's, but is more comfortably positioned than the low benches in the GM crossovers and the Pathfinder. The Elite trim level includes captains chairs, so it can only seat up to seven people. With a second-row split bench, other Pilots can seat eight people. The Pilot's largest seating advantage is its third row. Unlike in most crossovers, the cabin remains broad in the "way back," so there's enough shoulder room for three passengers. The Highlander's third-row bench, though also designed for three passengers, is somewhat narrower and lacking in legroom. Only the GM crossovers roughly match the new Pilot in third-row space as well as passenger capacity. The Pilot's seats are positioned so that the view forward from each is open, further enhancing perceived roominess. see full Honda Pilot review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Honda Pilot
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Honda Pilot.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
