| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Chevrolet Traverse and 2016 Nissan GT-R Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2016 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Traverse | Nissan GT-R | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,020 mm | 2,779 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,207 mm | 4,669 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,991 mm | 1,895 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,788 mm | 1,369 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,173 kg | 1,747 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 83 L | 74 L | 9 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 968 mm | -967 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,575 mm | 1,379 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,501 mm | 1,389 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,133 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,001 mm | 851 mm | -850 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,557 mm | 1,270 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,468 mm | 1,140 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 671 mm | 264 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 960 mm | 0 mm | 960 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,463 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,227 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 843 mm | 0 mm | 843 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,827 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,803 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 691 L | 249 L | 442 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,948 L | 8.8 | -7.8 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,296 L | 8.8 | -5.8 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Chevrolet Traverse
| 2010 Chevrolet Traverse Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 281-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The headrest position is horrible for long trips. Felt like my head was being pushed forward. see full Chevrolet Traverse review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Nissan GT-R
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Nissan GT-R.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
