| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Chevrolet Traverse and 2010 Toyota Matrix Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2010 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Traverse | Toyota Matrix | |
| Engine | 3.6L V6 DOHC-4v 281 hp@6300 266 lb-ft@3400 |
2.4L I4 DOHC-4v 158 hp@6000 162 lb-ft@4000 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 118.9 in | 102.4 in | 16.5 in |
| Length | 205.0 in | 171.9 in | 33.1 in |
| Width | 78.4 in | 69.5 in | 8.9 in |
| Height | 70.4 in | 61.4 in | 9 in |
| Curb Weight | 4790 lb. | 3140 lb. | 1650 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 22.0 gal. | 13.2 gal. | 8.8 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.4 in | 40.5 in | -0.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 62.0 in | 53.3 in | 8.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 59.1 in | 52.3 in | 6.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 41.6 in | -0.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.4 in | 39.3 in | 0.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 61.3 in | 52.6 in | 8.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 57.8 in | 43.7 in | 14.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 36.8 in | 36.2 in | 0.6 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 37.8 in | 0.0 in | 37.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 57.6 in | 0.0 in | 57.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 48.3 in | 0.0 in | 48.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 33.2 in | 0.0 in | 33.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 111.3 in (over 3 rows) | 77.8 in (over 2 rows) | 33.5 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 24.4 ft3 | 19.8 ft3 | 4.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 68.8 ft3 | 19.8 | 49 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 116.4 ft3 | 61.5 ft3 | 54.9 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Chevrolet Traverse
| 2010 Chevrolet Traverse Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 281-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The headrest position is horrible for long trips. Felt like my head was being pushed forward. see full Chevrolet Traverse review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota Matrix
| 2010 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat for a tall large guy is terrible this is why i got a BMW instead 2 years ago, my wife is using the Toyota see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2010 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
The front seat is not rally confortable for a big 6foot 300 pound guy. I have long torso and some time get back pain in the middle after long driving... see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat are horrible for an "high end" class (XRS) car ...
I considered getting rid of the car due to back pain, but my wife is using it now, I got a BMW
see full Toyota Matrix review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
