| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Chevrolet Traverse and 2010 Toyota Matrix Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2010 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Traverse | Toyota Matrix | |
| Engine | 3.6L V6 DOHC-4v 281 hp@6300 266 lb-ft@3400 |
2.4L I4 DOHC-4v 158 hp@6000 162 lb-ft@4000 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 118.9 in | 102.4 in | 16.5 in |
| Length | 203.7 in | 171.9 in | 31.8 in |
| Width | 78.5 in | 69.5 in | 9 in |
| Height | 69.9 in | 61.4 in | 8.5 in |
| Curb Weight | 4646 lb. | 3140 lb. | 1506 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 22.0 gal. | 13.2 gal. | 8.8 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.4 in | 40.5 in | -0.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 61.5 in | 53.3 in | 8.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 58.0 in | 52.3 in | 5.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 41.6 in | -0.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.4 in | 39.3 in | 0.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 61.0 in | 52.6 in | 8.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 57.8 in | 43.7 in | 14.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 36.8 in | 36.2 in | 0.6 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 37.8 in | 0.0 in | 37.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 57.6 in | 0.0 in | 57.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 48.3 in | 0.0 in | 48.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 33.2 in | 0.0 in | 33.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 111.3 in (over 3 rows) | 77.8 in (over 2 rows) | 33.5 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 24.4 ft3 | 19.8 ft3 | 4.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 70.3 ft3 | 19.8 | 50.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 116.3 ft3 | 61.5 ft3 | 54.8 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Traverse
| 2016 Chevrolet Traverse Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2016 | 4dr SUV 281-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
I bought this vehicle to be able to transport my grandchildren back and forth between New Jersey and Ohio. I have the 2LT version with four captains chairs and really enjoy the convienence of not having to move a middle row seat to allow one of them to get into the "way back". Having three kids jammed together in a middle seat for an 8 hour drive is courting disaster--that's why I needed that third seat. Everyone has plenty of space. Normally I find any drive over 4 hours a bit uncomfortable but the seat and driver's position was very relaxing and comfortable. This particular vehicle has the most room for storage behind the third seat than any in its class. It is only beat by minivans and they just aren't my kind of vehicle. see full Chevrolet Traverse review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota Matrix
| 2010 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat for a tall large guy is terrible this is why i got a BMW instead 2 years ago, my wife is using the Toyota see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2010 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
The front seat is not rally confortable for a big 6foot 300 pound guy. I have long torso and some time get back pain in the middle after long driving... see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat are horrible for an "high end" class (XRS) car ...
I considered getting rid of the car due to back pain, but my wife is using it now, I got a BMW
see full Toyota Matrix review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
