Model Year | 2006 | 2015 | |
Model | Chevrolet Uplander | Ford Mustang | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 2dr Coupe | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 121.1 in | 107.1 in | 14 in |
Length | 204.4 in | 188.3 in | 16.1 in |
Width | 72.0 in | 75.4 in | -3.4 in |
Height | 72.1 in | 54.4 in | 17.7 in |
Curb Weight | 4470 lb. | 3526 lb. | 944 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 25.0 gal. | 16.0 gal. | 9 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 39.8 in | 37.6 in | 2.2 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 59.9 in | 56.3 in | 3.6 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.8 in | 54.9 in | 0.9 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 39.9 in | 42.0 in | -2.1 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 38.9 in | 34.8 in | 4.1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 61.2 in | 52.2 in | 9 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 61.6 in | 47.4 in | 14.2 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 38.9 in | 30.6 in | 8.3 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 38.2 in | 0.0 in | 38.2 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 48.6 in | 0.0 in | 48.6 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 48.3 in | 0.0 in | 48.3 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 36.2 in | 0.0 in | 36.2 in |
Total Legroom | 115 in (over 3 rows) | 72.6 in (over 2 rows) | 42.4 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 26.9 ft3 | 13.5 ft3 | 13.4 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 74.1 ft3 | 13.5 | 60.6 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 136.5 ft3 | 13.5 ft3 | 123 ft3 |
2006 Chevrolet Uplander Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr Minivan 240-horsepower 3.9L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Good for hauling the family and cargo . see full Chevrolet Uplander review |
2005 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 200-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Lots of room, good headroom and legroom see full Chevrolet Uplander review |
2005 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 200-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Lots of adjustment possibilities, and it fits me well - comfortable for long drives see full Chevrolet Uplander review |
2015 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang.