Model Year | 2006 | 2015 | |
Model | Chevrolet Uplander | Honda Pilot | |
Engine | 3.9L V6 OHV-2v 240 hp@6000 240 lb-ft@4800 |
3.5L V6 OHC-4v 250 hp@5700 253 lb-ft@4800 |
|
Transmission | 4-speed automatic | 5-speed automatic | |
Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 3,076 mm | 2,774 mm | 1 mm |
Length | 5,192 mm | 4,862 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 1,829 mm | 1,994 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,831 mm | 1,803 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,050 kg | 1,950 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 95 L | 79 L | 16 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,011 mm | 1,016 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,521 mm | 1,562 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,417 mm | 1,488 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,013 mm | 1,052 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 988 mm | 1,011 mm | 987 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,554 mm | 1,580 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,565 mm | 1,445 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 988 mm | 978 mm | 10 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 970 mm | 970 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,234 mm | 1,496 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,227 mm | 1,229 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 919 mm | 815 mm | 104 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,921 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,845 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 762 L | 510 L | 252 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 2,098 L | 1,351 L | 1 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,865 L | 2,464 L | 1 L |
2006 Chevrolet Uplander Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr Minivan 240-horsepower 3.9L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Good for hauling the family and cargo . see full Chevrolet Uplander review |
2005 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 200-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Lots of room, good headroom and legroom see full Chevrolet Uplander review |
2005 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 200-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Lots of adjustment possibilities, and it fits me well - comfortable for long drives see full Chevrolet Uplander review |
2015 Honda Pilot Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2016 | According to their spec sheets, the Ford Explorer and Nissan Pathfinder have more rear legroom than the new Honda Pilot. In practice, though, the Pilot's rear legroom feels at least as generous as theirs--I suspect some creative measuring--and well ahead of what you'll find in a Toyota Highlander. The Pilot's second-row seat isn't as high off the floor as the Ford Explorer's, but is more comfortably positioned than the low benches in the GM crossovers and the Pathfinder. The Elite trim level includes captains chairs, so it can only seat up to seven people. With a second-row split bench, other Pilots can seat eight people. The Pilot's largest seating advantage is its third row. Unlike in most crossovers, the cabin remains broad in the "way back," so there's enough shoulder room for three passengers. The Highlander's third-row bench, though also designed for three passengers, is somewhat narrower and lacking in legroom. Only the GM crossovers roughly match the new Pilot in third-row space as well as passenger capacity. The Pilot's seats are positioned so that the view forward from each is open, further enhancing perceived roominess. see full Honda Pilot review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Honda Pilot.