| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Chevrolet Volt and 2016 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2016 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Volt | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,685 mm | 2,720 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,498 mm | 4,783 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,788 mm | 1,915 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,438 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,715 kg | 1,599 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 35 L | 61 L | -26 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 960 mm | 955 mm | 5 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,435 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,364 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,069 mm | 1,067 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 914 mm | 884 mm | 30 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,369 mm | 1,326 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,300 mm | 1,204 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 866 mm | 777 mm | 89 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,935 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 300 L | 382 L | -82 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 0 L | 13.5 | -13.5 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Chevrolet Volt
| 2011 Chevrolet Volt Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr Hatch 149-horsepower Electric + Gas CVT FWD |
The front seats offer very good support and the seat bottoms are designed for tall drivers.. see full Chevrolet Volt review |
| 2011 Chevrolet Volt Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr Hatch 149-horsepower Electric + Gas CVT FWD |
Front seats are semi-hard and covered in strange material. I could see people larger than myself having issues with them. see full Chevrolet Volt review |
| 2012 | 4dr Hatch 149-horsepower Electric + Gas CVT FWD |
No power seat in a $46k car?? Get real, Chevy. Once you get used to them, though, both front and rear seats are comfortable for up to an hour or so. Longer than that and I need different lower back support that it doesn't have. But they are heated which is nice and it's comfortable leather. A few tweaks and/or an optional chair & this would be a non-issue. see full Chevrolet Volt review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
