Model Year | 2015 | 2016 | |
Model | Chrysler 200 | Chevrolet Malibu | |
Engine | 3.6L V6 DOHC-4v 295 hp@6350 262 lb-ft@4250 |
turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 250 hp@5300 260 lb-ft@2000 |
|
Transmission | 9-speed shiftable automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,743 mm | 2,830 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,884 mm | 4,923 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,869 mm | 1,854 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,491 mm | 1,466 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,640 kg | 1,537 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 60 L | 49 L | 11 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 958 mm | 993 mm | -35 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,486 mm | 1,486 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,384 mm | 1,374 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,072 mm | 1,067 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 950 mm | 953 mm | -3 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,440 mm | 1,450 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,339 mm | 1,356 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 955 mm | 968 mm | -13 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,027 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,035 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume | 453 L | 447 L | 6 L |
2015 Chrysler 200 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The Chrysler 200 shares its basic structure with the compact Dodge Dart. This basis is most evident in the back seat, where legroom is decent but hiproom is considerably tighter than in most midsize sedans. Thanks to the stylish roof line, rear headroom is also in short supply. The Fusion's rear seat isn't nearly the roomiest in the class, but it is roomier and more comfortable than the Chrysler's. If you need a truly roomy rear seat and all-wheel-drive in a somewhat affordable midsize sedan, buy the Legacy. see full Chrysler 200 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Chrysler 200.
2016 Chevrolet Malibu Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2016 | Chevrolet's designers styled the new Malibu's instrument panel to appear low and out of the way, such that the front seat feels especially roomy and the view forward seems more open than in most competitors, including the Kia (the instrument panel in which seems significantly higher and more imposing). In the tested car, which had every option except the panoramic sunroof, headroom was so abundant I could have worn a fedora. The Kia Optima might have as much front headroom when similarly without a sunroof. The official specs, which often don't reflect real world differences, suggest it should have even more than the Malibu. But you cannot get a highly equipped Optima without the sunroof, as it's part of a large package on the SX and standard on the SX Limited. Though the Malibu's windshield is relatively large, you won't find outward visibility among the reasons to buy one. The Chevrolet's front pillars remain on the thick side, its instrument panel is considerably deeper than the Kia's, and the view to the sides and rear also could be more open. In the Optima, the view to the sides is more open but that to the rear is not. I did find the Cherolet's front seats more form-fitting and comfortable than the Optima's. The Kia's quilted seats aren't as cushy as they appear. see full Chevrolet Malibu review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Malibu.