| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2007 Chrysler 300 and 2016 Volvo V60 Specifications
| Model Year | 2007 | 2016 | |
| Model | Chrysler 300 | Volvo V60 | |
| Engine | 6.1L V8 OHV-2v 425 hp@6000 420 lb-ft@4800 |
turbocharged 3.0L I6 DOHC-4v 345 hp@5250 369 lb-ft@3000 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Wagon | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 120.0 in | 109.3 in | 10.7 in |
| Length | 196.8 in | 182.5 in | 14.3 in |
| Width | 74.1 in | 73.4 in | 0.7 in |
| Height | 58.4 in | 58.4 in | 0 in |
| Curb Weight | 4160 lb. | 3790 lb. | 370 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 18.0 gal. | 17.8 gal. | 0.2 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.7 in | 38.7 in | 0 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 59.4 in | 57.0 in | 2.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.9 in | 54.9 in | 1 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.8 in | 41.9 in | -0.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.0 in | 37.4 in | -0.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 57.7 in | 55.2 in | 2.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 55.9 in | 53.5 in | 2.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 40.2 in | 33.5 in | 6.7 in |
| Total Legroom | 82 in (over 2 rows) | 75.4 in (over 2 rows) | 6.6 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 15.6 ft3 | 15.2 ft3 | 0.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 15.6 ft3 | 43.8 ft3 | -28.2 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Chrysler 300
| 2007 Chrysler 300 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 178-horsepower 2.7L V6 4-speed automatic RWD |
Roomy and comfortable see full Chrysler 300 review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic RWD |
Tons of room in the front seat. I am tall and I still have the seat adjusted in the middle, not all the way back, with lots of head room and leg room to spare. The passenger side is even better. see full Chrysler 300 review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic RWD |
The back seats have just as much room as the front seats. They fit the whole family with no problems, and you can even pick up the in-laws and they will fit back there perfectly. see full Chrysler 300 review |
| 2008 | 4dr Wagon turbocharged 215hp 3.0L V6 Diesel 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
vast space see full Chrysler 300 review |
| 2007 | 4dr Sedan 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Lots of room in the front, heated front seats and a nice comfy seat. Just returned from a 7 hour trip in the car and not once did i feel uncomfortable. see full Chrysler 300 review |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 340-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
I can adjust the seat to just about any position to be comfortable. I have taken 4-hour nonstop drives and remained comfortable to the end. see full Chrysler 300 review |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 340-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The adjustable seats fit anyone. see full Chrysler 300 review |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 340-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
we have big friends, more leg than most other cars in its size see full Chrysler 300 review |
| 2007 Chrysler 300 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Stiff and firm. see full Chrysler 300 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Volvo V60
| 2016 Volvo V60 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | The V60's interior doesn't only look comfortable. Even back in the day Volvo's cars weren't known only for safety. Many people considered their seats the best. Many still do. The V60's front seats are much cushier than those in a German car, but they are also properly supportive. One caveat. Locate the headrest to receive top scores from the crash test dummy and it will jut too far forward for people with especially upright postures--like me. "Active headrests" that move forward if and when the car is rear-ended can sidestep this tradeoff. But the V60's active headrests do not. The BMW's seats are much firmer, but their headrests have a fore-aft adjustment. You also sit significantly lower in the BMW, but its instrument panel isn't as deep (owing to its windshield being more upright), for a more open view forward. Your build and impressions of either car's seats may vary. see full Volvo V60 review | |
| 2016 Volvo V60 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Volvo V60's rear seat space also lags the BMW's. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a couple inches to spare, but subjectively the limited space seems even tighter than it is. The side window outline that appears sexy from the outside can seem confining from the inside. Large front seat headrests block the view forward. Behind a tall driver even adults of modest size will feel cramped, if they can fit at all. The BMW wagon has a little less headroom but a couple more inches of much-needed knee room. Also, while the Volvo's cabin is a couple inches wider than the BMW's up front, and feels much roomier as a result, this advantage disappears in back. see full Volvo V60 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Volvo V60
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Volvo V60.
See TrueDelta's information for all Chrysler models.
