| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2007 Chrysler Aspen and 2012 Honda Fit Specifications
| Model Year | 2007 | 2012 | |
| Model | Chrysler Aspen | Honda Fit | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 119.2 in | 98.4 in | 20.8 in |
| Length | 200.8 in | 161.6 in | 39.2 in |
| Width | 76.0 in | 66.7 in | 9.3 in |
| Height | 74.3 in | 60.0 in | 14.3 in |
| Curb Weight | 4859 lb. | 2496 lb. | 2363 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 27.0 gal. | 10.6 gal. | 16.4 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.8 in | 40.4 in | 0.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 59.4 in | 52.7 in | 6.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 58.8 in | 51.5 in | 7.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.4 in | 41.3 in | 0.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.3 in | 39.0 in | 0.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 59.6 in | 51.3 in | 8.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 57.2 in | 51.3 in | 5.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 37.4 in | 34.5 in | 2.9 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 39.2 in | 0.0 in | 39.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 58.9 in | 0.0 in | 58.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 48.0 in | 0.0 in | 48 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 34.5 in | 0.0 in | 34.5 in |
| Total Legroom | 113.3 in (over 3 rows) | 75.8 in (over 2 rows) | 37.5 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 19.0 ft3 | 20.6 ft3 | -1.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 67.3 ft3 | 20.6 | 46.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 102.4 ft3 | 57.3 ft3 | 45.1 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Chrysler Aspen
| 2007 Chrysler Aspen Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 303-horsepower 4.7L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
Its equipped with two captains chairs and a console for passenegers. Plenty of room all around and easy exit and entry. see full Chrysler Aspen review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda Fit
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Chrysler models.
