| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2007 Chrysler Sebring and 2012 Honda Fit Specifications
| Model Year | 2007 | 2012 | |
| Model | Chrysler Sebring | Honda Fit | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 108.9 in | 98.4 in | 10.5 in |
| Length | 190.6 in | 161.6 in | 29 in |
| Width | 71.2 in | 66.7 in | 4.5 in |
| Height | 59.0 in | 60.0 in | -1 in |
| Curb Weight | 3287 lb. | 2496 lb. | 791 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 17.0 gal. | 10.6 gal. | 6.4 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.0 in | 40.4 in | -0.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.4 in | 52.7 in | 3.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.5 in | 51.5 in | 2 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 41.3 in | 1.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.4 in | 39.0 in | -0.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 56.4 in | 51.3 in | 5.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 53.2 in | 51.3 in | 1.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 37.6 in | 34.5 in | 3.1 in |
| Total Legroom | 80 in (over 2 rows) | 75.8 in (over 2 rows) | 4.2 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.9 ft3 | 20.6 ft3 | -6.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.9 ft3 | 57.3 ft3 | -43.4 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Chrysler Sebring
| 2007 Chrysler Sebring Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 173-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Largest in its class so far as I can tell after going from dealership to dealship to compare. see full Chrysler Sebring review |
| 2007 Chrysler Sebring Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 150-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
While there is ample room in my Sebring, the seats are not designed for long trips. Hard, ungiving seats are my complaint. see full Chrysler Sebring review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda Fit
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Chrysler models.
