Model Year | 2001 | 2013 | |
Model | Chrysler PT Cruiser | ||
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | |||
Difference | |||
Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
2001 Chrysler PT Cruiser Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2002 | 4dr Wagon 150-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
There is plenty of leg room and being a large person you are not crammed into the front seat while in th car and because of the ample room getting in and out of the car is easy. see full Chrysler PT Cruiser review |
2002 | 4dr Wagon 150-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
The seats are built well, Soft and more than adequate for a long road trip. see full Chrysler PT Cruiser review |
2001 Chrysler PT Cruiser Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2002 | 4dr Wagon 150-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Leg room is cramped if the front seats are adjusted all the way back and the seat is considerably harder than the front seats. see full Chrysler PT Cruiser review |
2013 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The Cadillac ELR's rear seat is very tight for the average adult, but a couple 5-9 or under can sit back there without outright discomfort. The BMW i8's rear seat is so tight and so vestigial that putting all but the shortest people back there borders on cruel and unusual punishment. I squeezed into the i8's back seat to photograph its instrument panel interior and almost couldn't get out. For those who want an adult-friendly rear seat, the Tesla Model S is far superior to either coupe. see full review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 .