| Model Year | 2009 | 2006 | |
| Model | Chrysler Sebring | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Convertible | 2dr Convertible | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 108.9 in | 107.1 in | 1.8 in |
| Length | 193.8 in | 187.6 in | 6.2 in |
| Width | 71.5 in | 73.9 in | -2.4 in |
| Height | 58.5 in | 55.7 in | 2.8 in |
| Curb Weight | 3742 lb. | 3476 lb. | 266 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 17.0 gal. | 16.0 gal. | 1 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.8 in | 38.8 in | 0 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.4 in | 55.4 in | 1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.3 in | 53.6 in | -0.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 42.7 in | -0.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.2 in | 36.3 in | 0.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 48.5 in | 45.0 in | 3.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 44.2 in | 45.2 in | -1 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 33.5 in | 30.3 in | 3.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 75.9 in (over 2 rows) | 73 in (over 2 rows) | 2.9 in |
| Cargo Volume | 11.3 ft3 | 9.7 ft3 | 1.6 ft3 |
| 2009 Chrysler Sebring Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 173-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Beats Accord in seat comfort. see full Chrysler Sebring review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 173-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Largest in its class so far as I can tell after going from dealership to dealship to compare. see full Chrysler Sebring review |
| 2006 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
seat is comfortable can be adjusted to suit your choice of position all controls are within easy reach see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Driving position is very flexible, all the controls are within reach and easy to use. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Plenty of leg room for tall people like me. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2006 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
While our present government may blow off the standards & principles of the Geneva Convention, I still find them worthy enough to abide. Mustang rear seats are in clear violation. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
The Mustang is a cool car, but nowhere near as comfortable see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
Not much room in the back of a Mustang... see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is small for adults. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
Rear seat is for kids. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
Rear seats in name only. No real passenger room see full Ford Mustang review |