Chrysler Town & Country Chrysler Town & Country 2009 Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2003

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Chrysler Town & Country (2009) vs. Ford Ranger (2003) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2009 Chrysler Town & Country and 2003 Ford Ranger specs.

2009 Chrysler Town & Country and 2003 Ford Ranger Specifications

Model Year 2009 2003  
Model Chrysler Town & Country Ford Ranger  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Chrysler Town & Country

2009 Chrysler Town & Country Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 4dr Minivan, ext. 197-horsepower 3.8L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
It holds 5 people in the rear comfortly. It also has great utility. With the Stow & Go seats they all fold neatly into the floor. It even fits a 4 foot by 8 foot sheet of plywood -- I did not have to rent a truck from Home Depot. see full Chrysler Town & Country review
2009 4dr Minivan, ext. 251-horsepower 4.0L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
Better seats and seating position than Town Car or Deville as a comparison. see full Chrysler Town & Country review
2009 4dr Minivan, ext. 251-horsepower 4.0L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
Room for adults see full Chrysler Town & Country review
2008 4dr Minivan, ext. 175-horsepower 3.3L V6
4-speed shiftable automatic FWD
Need van for cross country trip,,,this van is huge inside.. see full Chrysler Town & Country review
2009 Chrysler Town & Country Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr Minivan, ext. 251-horsepower 4.0L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
Stow-n-Go rear seats (rear AND middle seats fold flat into floor) are a mixed blessing. GREAT for cargo room flexibility but too small for best comfort for larger adults. see full Chrysler Town & Country review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003 Ford Ranger

2003 Ford Ranger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2004 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
The jump seats in a Ranger are not very practical for long trips what so ever, not much room other than for storage, and they are not comfortable. I think that a Full 4 door model of the Ranger would be great, maybe a redesign will incorporate a backseat see full Ford Ranger review
2002 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
The rear seats are very small but I did not buy it for rear seat comfort. I actually removed the seats to get more storage space behind the front seats. see full Ford Ranger review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all Minivans
See TrueDelta's information for all Chrysler models.