Dodge Charger (2013) vs. Chevrolet Malibu (2017) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2013 Dodge Charger and 2017 Chevrolet Malibu specs.
2013 Dodge Charger and 2017 Chevrolet Malibu Specifications
Model Year |
2013 |
2017 |
|
Model |
Dodge Charger |
Chevrolet Malibu |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr Sedan |
4dr Sedan |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
3,053 mm |
2,830 mm |
1 mm |
Length |
5,077 mm |
4,923 mm |
1 mm |
Width |
1,905 mm |
1,854 mm |
0 mm |
Height |
1,483 mm |
1,466 mm |
0 mm |
Curb Weight |
1,797 kg |
1,400 kg |
0 kg |
Fuel Capacity |
72 L |
49 L |
23 L |
Headroom, Row 1 |
980 mm |
993 mm |
-13 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
1,511 mm |
1,486 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 |
1,427 mm |
1,374 mm |
0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 |
1,062 mm |
1,067 mm |
0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 |
930 mm |
953 mm |
-23 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
1,471 mm |
1,450 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 |
1,425 mm |
1,356 mm |
0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 |
1,019 mm |
968 mm |
-967 mm |
Total Legroom |
2,080 mm (over 2 rows) |
2,035 mm (over 2 rows) |
0 mm |
Cargo Volume |
436 L |
447 L |
-11 L |
Return to top
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Dodge Charger
2012 |
The V6 Charger also feels right because it sits right. Sitting moderately high in the big comfortable seat gazing over an expansive hood, you might start to wonder why traditional American cars don't rule the road the way they once did. Visibility isn't the best, but the 2011 redesign did enlarge the windows, alleviating the bunker-like ambiance of the 2005-2010 sedans.
see full Dodge Charger review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Dodge Charger
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Dodge Charger.
Be the first!
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Chevrolet Malibu
2016 |
Chevrolet's designers styled the new Malibu's instrument panel to appear low and out of the way, such that the front seat feels especially roomy and the view forward seems more open than in most competitors, including the Kia (the instrument panel in which seems significantly higher and more imposing). In the tested car, which had every option except the panoramic sunroof, headroom was so abundant I could have worn a fedora.
The Kia Optima might have as much front headroom when similarly without a sunroof. The official specs, which often don't reflect real world differences, suggest it should have even more than the Malibu. But you cannot get a highly equipped Optima without the sunroof, as it's part of a large package on the SX and standard on the SX Limited.
Though the Malibu's windshield is relatively large, you won't find outward visibility among the reasons to buy one. The Chevrolet's front pillars remain on the thick side, its instrument panel is considerably deeper than the Kia's, and the view to the sides and rear also could be more open. In the Optima, the view to the sides is more open but that to the rear is not.
I did find the Cherolet's front seats more form-fitting and comfortable than the Optima's. The Kia's quilted seats aren't as cushy as they appear.
see full Chevrolet Malibu review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Chevrolet Malibu
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Chevrolet Malibu.
Be the first!
See TrueDelta's information for all
Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all
Dodge models.