| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Dodge Charger and 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2016 | |
| Model | Dodge Charger | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,048 mm | 2,946 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,083 mm | 5,182 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,892 mm | 2,045 mm | -1 mm |
| Height | 1,478 mm | 1,890 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,724 kg | 2,479 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 68 L | 98 L | -30 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 983 mm | 1,087 mm | 982 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,506 mm | 1,646 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,427 mm | 1,544 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,151 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 919 mm | 983 mm | -64 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,463 mm | 1,654 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,427 mm | 1,532 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,021 mm | 991 mm | -990 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 968 mm | -968 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,590 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,252 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 630 mm | -630 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,083 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,771 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 459 L | 433 L | 26 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 16.2 | 1,461 L | 15.2 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 16.2 | 2,682 L | 14.2 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Dodge Charger
| 2009 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic RWD |
I previously owned a crossover vehicle and this car has much more leg room. see full Dodge Charger review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic RWD |
Plenty of leg room. see full Dodge Charger review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic RWD |
Plenty of leg room and comfortable seats for long road trips.No knees bumping the front seats even with the front seats all the way back. see full Dodge Charger review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 340-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Enough roon for a big guy like me to be totally comfortable. No having to hold my legs in an odd position, like one of my past cars, or put my left arm in an uncomfortable spot to be able to relax it. Having big feet makes many cars torture devices. see full Dodge Charger review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 340-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Lots of room, this is a big car. see full Dodge Charger review |
| 2009 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic RWD |
VERY roomy. I am a big guy (just over 6 feet and 300lbs) and I am very comfortable in this car. It has almost as much room up front as my 1966 Impala! see full Dodge Charger review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
| 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Some (perhaps more than some) people are drawn to large SUVs because they like to feel like the king of the road when behind the wheel. Others need a lot of space while driving, or at least feel they do. Few vehicles have more front seat room than the new Tahoe. With an inch-and-a-half less shoulder room, the Ford's front-row dimensions aren't quite as generous, and its taller, shifter-festooned console is more intrusive. The front seats are comfortable in both. The Expedition's are a little wider and softer, and they're upholstered with especially rich hides in the King Ranch and Platinum (vs. the most recently tested and photographed Limited). Whether this is preferable is a matter of taste. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | |
| 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Both the Tahoe and Expedition have roomy, comfortable second-row seats, with a slight edge to the higher cushions in the Chevrolet. Bonus points to the Tahoe for automatic rear climate controls (they're manual in the Expedition). Move to the third-row seat, and you'll wonder why, despite redesigns for 2007 and 2015, General Motors has stubbornly refused to follow Ford's 2003 switch from a solid rear axle to an independent rear suspension. With a solid axle, the rear floor must be high to permit the rear differential to travel up and down when a wheel hits a bump. Consequently, the Tahoe's third row seat must be very thinly constructed and mounted very close to the floor. Even pre-teen children won't be comfortable in it. In sharp contrast, the Expedition's third-row seat is higher off the floor than its second-row seat, much less the ridiculously low third row in the Tahoe, and is--surprise--considerably more comfortable as a result. The Suburban's third-row seat is roomier than the Tahoe's but still far inferior to the Expedition's. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Dodge models.
