| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Dodge Charger and 2013 Toyota Camry Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2013 | |
| Model | Dodge Charger | Toyota Camry | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 120.2 in | 109.3 in | 10.9 in |
| Length | 199.9 in | 189.2 in | 10.7 in |
| Width | 75.0 in | 71.7 in | 3.3 in |
| Height | 58.4 in | 57.9 in | 0.5 in |
| Curb Weight | 3961 lb. | 3190 lb. | 771 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 19.1 gal. | 17.0 gal. | 2.1 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.6 in | 38.8 in | -0.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 59.5 in | 58.0 in | 1.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 56.2 in | 54.5 in | 1.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.8 in | 41.6 in | 0.2 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 36.6 in | 38.1 in | -1.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 57.9 in | 56.6 in | 1.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 56.1 in | 54.5 in | 1.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 40.1 in | 38.9 in | 1.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 81.9 in (over 2 rows) | 80.5 in (over 2 rows) | 1.4 in |
| Cargo Volume | 15.4 ft3 | 15.4 ft3 | 0 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Dodge Charger
| 2014 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | The Road & Track package includes some of the best front seats I've experienced. The side bolsters, though not adjustable, manage to effectively hold slender drivers in place without uncomfortably constraining far-from-slender ones. Synthetic suede center panels assist in this task. Yet as performance-oriented as these seats are, they aren't overly firm, and should prove comfortable even on day-long drives. Despite the more hardcore nature of the Chevrolet SS, its front seats have much smaller, far less effective bolsters. Some synthetic suede helps to mitigate this shortcoming, but the Dodge's buckets are much better for both comfort and support. see full Dodge Charger review | |
| 2014 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Dodge Charger's rear seat cushion is comfortably shaped and positioned. Rear knee room, though less abundant than the sedan's exterior dimensions might suggest, is neverless generous. So what is rear seat room doing among the reasons not to buy a Charger? Well, headroom is in short supply. People 5-11 and up could become painfully familiar with the backlight. Shorter passengers won't experience this issue, but could find the back seat uncomfortably confining because the smallish rear side windows descend only to neck level. For more rear headroom and larger rear side windows, check out the related Chrysler 300. Or the Chevrolet SS, which has 1.4 inches more rear headroom than the Charger. see full Dodge Charger review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Dodge Charger
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Dodge Charger.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Toyota Camry
| 2013 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan 156-horsepower 2.5L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD |
Being 6' 3" it can be hard to find a car where I have sufficient legroom & headroom. In the Fusion Hybrid there was lots of space, even with a sunroof. There are also padded surfaces where my left knee rests against the door and where my right leg rests against the center console. The Camry Hybrid was not comfortable. The doors are hard plastic and there was no soft place to rest my knee. The center console was also hard plastic. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan 178-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
We will use this as a "road car" on longer trips so front seat comfort along with interior -and- trunk room is very good, better than Kia Optima considered. Two large adults comment rear seat also very comfortable. Front seat easier exit too. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2013 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 0 | Nice ergonomic shape, but not enough padding. Leather seats feel decidedly firm after two months of ownership. Seat cushion length should be slightly longer for thigh support. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan 156-horsepower 2.5L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD |
front seat could be improved for better thigh support for tall drivers see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan 156-horsepower 2.5L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD |
front seat could be improved for better thigh support for tall drivers see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan 156-horsepower 2.5L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD |
The door sills are very high which made it tough for me to get my size 13 shoes up and over when sitting behind a front seat that is all the way back. The door sills in the Camry were lower so while there was no more rear seat room than in the Fusion is was possible to get my feet out more easily. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan 156-horsepower 2.5L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD |
You can see I'm really reaching here to find things that we didn't like about the Fusion Hybrid, but here's one more... There is a small step up in front of the front seats which made it hard to cross my legs like when traveling on road trips. see full Toyota Camry review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Dodge models.
