Ford C-MAX (2012) vs. Infiniti Q50 (2014) Specs

vs.

◆

2012 Ford C-MAX and 2014 Infiniti Q50 Specifications

2012 Ford C-MAX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Comment
	There's plenty of space for adults in the back seat of the C-MAX. But the seat is mounted too low to provide thigh support, and between this and the angle of the floor I could find no comfortable way to position my legs and feet. There's a huge amount of headroom, so this was not the limiting factor. Instead, the seat seems to be so low to enable a flat floor when it is folded without requiring that the seat bottom be folded separately from the seat back. Combine the low seat with a high beltline (bottom of the side windows), and children can't see out well. see full Ford C-MAX review

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2012 Ford C-MAX.

2014 Infiniti Q50 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Comment
2014	Like the G37, the Q50 has one of the roomiest rear seats among BMW 3-Series challengers. On paper it offers the most combined rear legroom, 44.5 inches in the front seat and 35.1 inches in back, about 2.5 more than the BMW and Lexus. But the difference doesn't seem as large as this number suggests. The Audi S4 and Cadillac ATS remain more cramped. The Q50 doesn't come by its extra room through brilliant packaging. Instead, at 188 inches it's about a half-foot longer than a 3-Series or ATS. see full Infiniti Q50 review

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Infiniti Q50.

See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks

See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.