

Model Year | 2016 | 2015 | |
Model | Ford C-MAX | Lexus RX | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,649 mm | 2,741 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,409 mm | 4,770 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,829 mm | 1,885 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,623 mm | 1,684 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,636 kg | 1,895 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 51 L | 73 L | -22 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 993 mm | -992 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,420 mm | 1,473 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,379 mm | 1,410 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 1,095 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,001 mm | 958 mm | -957 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,402 mm | 1,463 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,318 mm | 1,384 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 927 mm | 935 mm | -8 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,953 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,029 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 694 L | 1,133 L | 693 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,489 L | 2,274 L | -1 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford C-MAX.
2015 Lexus RX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The Lexus RX has the roomiest back seat of the three, the Lincoln MKX the tightest. Very tall people will prefer the RX's. At 5-9, I'm not tall, and found the other two back seats much more comfortable, with higher, better shaped cushions providing better thigh support and seat backs that were not overly reclined. The RX's rear seat back felt overly reclined to me even in its most upright position. Since it adjusts, why didn't Lexus engineer it to adjust over a wider range? see full Lexus RX review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Lexus RX.