| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Ford EcoSport and 2013 Volkswagen Eos Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2013 | |
| Model | Ford EcoSport | Volkswagen Eos | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford EcoSport
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford EcoSport.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Volkswagen Eos
| 2013 Volkswagen Eos Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD |
The back seat is not comfortable and has limited leg room. While the latter may be typical of some convertibles, leg room is less than on previous convertibles I have owned. see full Volkswagen Eos review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
