| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2000 Ford Expedition and 2011 Acura MDX Specifications
| Model Year | 2000 | 2011 | |
| Model | Ford Expedition | Acura MDX | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2000 Ford Expedition
| 2000 Ford Expedition Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2000 | 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 5.4L V8 4-speed automatic RWD |
Rear bucket seats as comfortable and roomy as front row. see full Ford Expedition review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Acura MDX
| 2011 Acura MDX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The interior prioritizes appearance over actual utility; it's surprisingly cramped for such a large vehicle. For example, my Highlander is roughly the same size externally but seems downright cavernous on the inside in comparison. A rear passenger can fully stretch out in the Toyota. Not so in the Acura. see full Acura MDX review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
