Ford Expedition (2014) vs. Chevrolet Malibu (2016) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2014 Ford Expedition and 2016 Chevrolet Malibu specs.
2014 Ford Expedition and 2016 Chevrolet Malibu Specifications
Model Year |
2014 |
2016 |
|
Model |
Ford Expedition |
Chevrolet Malibu |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr SUV |
4dr Sedan |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
119.0 in |
111.4 in |
7.6 in |
Length |
206.5 in |
193.8 in |
12.7 in |
Width |
78.8 in |
73.0 in |
5.8 in |
Height |
77.2 in |
57.7 in |
19.5 in |
Curb Weight |
5578 lb. |
3086 lb. |
2492 lb. |
Fuel Capacity |
28.0 gal. |
13.0 gal. |
15 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 |
39.6 in |
39.1 in |
0.5 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
63.2 in |
58.5 in |
4.7 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 |
60.2 in |
54.1 in |
6.1 in |
Legroom, Row 1 |
41.1 in |
42.0 in |
-0.9 in |
Headroom, Row 2 |
39.8 in |
37.5 in |
2.3 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
63.7 in |
57.1 in |
6.6 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 |
59.9 in |
53.4 in |
6.5 in |
Legroom, Row 2 |
39.1 in |
38.1 in |
1 in |
Headroom, Row 3 |
38.3 in |
0.0 in |
38.3 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 |
51.9 in |
0.0 in |
51.9 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 |
50.2 in |
0.0 in |
50.2 in |
Legroom, Row 3 |
37.7 in |
0.0 in |
37.7 in |
Total Legroom |
117.9 in (over 3 rows) |
80.1 in (over 2 rows) |
37.8 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum |
18.6 ft3 |
15.8 ft3 |
2.8 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 |
55.0 ft3 |
15.8 |
39.2 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum |
108.3 ft3 |
15.8 ft3 |
92.5 ft3 |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Expedition
2014 |
0 |
The driven Limited trim had black heated and cooled front seats. The cooling was necessary in the summertime Texas heat and perfomed well - I turned them on every time I got in the car (unlike the Lexus system, that you can leave on as it is a dial, you have to activate the cooling every single time you restart the car). These thrones were comfortable for a 4 hour drive - there was more room for someone who has more girth than I. Also, adjustable pedals are a great Ford innovation that I wish more manufacturers would include. My wife (who is 11 inches shorter than me) could easily drive this beast comfortably, without sitting too close to the steering wheel.
see full Ford Expedition review |
2014 |
0 |
Both the second and third rows have ample room, with and without kid's car seats, for three across. The third row isn't an afterthought like in other SUVs and even 5'11" adults are happy back there. Additionally, the vents provide adequate AC in 100+ degree heat. There are plenty of easily accessible LATCH anchors if you wish (although seatbelts are generally just as easy and have a higher weight rating with car seats than the LATCH anchors). Most minivans (except the Odyssey) do not have LATCH in the center of the second row - only on the outboard - and only have LATCH in the center of the third row. The Expedition (and Odyssey) is nice because they are flexible where you can put car seats comfortably.
see full Ford Expedition review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Malibu
2016 |
Chevrolet's designers styled the new Malibu's instrument panel to appear low and out of the way, such that the front seat feels especially roomy and the view forward seems more open than in most competitors, including the Kia (the instrument panel in which seems significantly higher and more imposing). In the tested car, which had every option except the panoramic sunroof, headroom was so abundant I could have worn a fedora.
The Kia Optima might have as much front headroom when similarly without a sunroof. The official specs, which often don't reflect real world differences, suggest it should have even more than the Malibu. But you cannot get a highly equipped Optima without the sunroof, as it's part of a large package on the SX and standard on the SX Limited.
Though the Malibu's windshield is relatively large, you won't find outward visibility among the reasons to buy one. The Chevrolet's front pillars remain on the thick side, its instrument panel is considerably deeper than the Kia's, and the view to the sides and rear also could be more open. In the Optima, the view to the sides is more open but that to the rear is not.
I did find the Cherolet's front seats more form-fitting and comfortable than the Optima's. The Kia's quilted seats aren't as cushy as they appear.
see full Chevrolet Malibu review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Malibu
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Malibu.
Be the first!
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all
Ford models.