Ford Expedition (2013) vs. Chevrolet SS (2017) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2013 Ford Expedition and 2017 Chevrolet SS specs.
2013 Ford Expedition and 2017 Chevrolet SS Specifications
Model Year |
2013 |
2017 |
|
Model |
Ford Expedition |
Chevrolet SS |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr SUV |
4dr Sedan |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
119.0 in |
114.8 in |
4.2 in |
Length |
206.5 in |
195.5 in |
11 in |
Width |
78.8 in |
74.7 in |
4.1 in |
Height |
77.2 in |
57.9 in |
19.3 in |
Curb Weight |
5578 lb. |
3997 lb. |
1581 lb. |
Fuel Capacity |
28.0 gal. |
18.8 gal. |
9.2 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 |
39.6 in |
38.7 in |
0.9 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
63.2 in |
59.1 in |
4.1 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 |
60.2 in |
57.2 in |
3 in |
Legroom, Row 1 |
41.1 in |
42.3 in |
-1.2 in |
Headroom, Row 2 |
39.8 in |
38.0 in |
1.8 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
63.7 in |
59.0 in |
4.7 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 |
59.9 in |
58.0 in |
1.9 in |
Legroom, Row 2 |
39.1 in |
39.7 in |
-0.6 in |
Headroom, Row 3 |
38.3 in |
0.0 in |
38.3 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 |
51.9 in |
0.0 in |
51.9 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 |
50.2 in |
0.0 in |
50.2 in |
Legroom, Row 3 |
37.7 in |
0.0 in |
37.7 in |
Total Legroom |
117.9 in (over 3 rows) |
82 in (over 2 rows) |
35.9 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum |
18.6 ft3 |
16.4 ft3 |
2.2 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 |
55.0 ft3 |
16.4 |
38.6 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum |
108.3 ft3 |
16.4 ft3 |
91.9 ft3 |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Expedition
2014 |
0 |
The driven Limited trim had black heated and cooled front seats. The cooling was necessary in the summertime Texas heat and perfomed well - I turned them on every time I got in the car (unlike the Lexus system, that you can leave on as it is a dial, you have to activate the cooling every single time you restart the car). These thrones were comfortable for a 4 hour drive - there was more room for someone who has more girth than I. Also, adjustable pedals are a great Ford innovation that I wish more manufacturers would include. My wife (who is 11 inches shorter than me) could easily drive this beast comfortably, without sitting too close to the steering wheel.
see full Ford Expedition review |
2014 |
0 |
Both the second and third rows have ample room, with and without kid's car seats, for three across. The third row isn't an afterthought like in other SUVs and even 5'11" adults are happy back there. Additionally, the vents provide adequate AC in 100+ degree heat. There are plenty of easily accessible LATCH anchors if you wish (although seatbelts are generally just as easy and have a higher weight rating with car seats than the LATCH anchors). Most minivans (except the Odyssey) do not have LATCH in the center of the second row - only on the outboard - and only have LATCH in the center of the third row. The Expedition (and Odyssey) is nice because they are flexible where you can put car seats comfortably.
see full Ford Expedition review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Chevrolet SS
2017 |
4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2017 |
4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all
Ford models.