Ford Expedition (2009) vs. GMC Terrain (2014) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2009 Ford Expedition and 2014 GMC Terrain specs.
2009 Ford Expedition and 2014 GMC Terrain Specifications
Model Year |
2009 |
2014 |
|
Model |
Ford Expedition |
GMC Terrain |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr SUV |
4dr SUV |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
3,023 mm |
2,858 mm |
1 mm |
Length |
5,245 mm |
4,707 mm |
1 mm |
Width |
2,002 mm |
1,849 mm |
1 mm |
Height |
1,961 mm |
1,684 mm |
0 mm |
Curb Weight |
2,530 kg |
1,748 kg |
1 kg |
Fuel Capacity |
106 L |
71 L |
35 L |
Headroom, Row 1 |
1,006 mm |
1,011 mm |
0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
1,605 mm |
1,415 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 |
1,529 mm |
1,400 mm |
0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 |
1,044 mm |
1,046 mm |
0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 |
1,011 mm |
996 mm |
-995 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
1,618 mm |
1,405 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 |
1,521 mm |
1,303 mm |
0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 |
993 mm |
1,013 mm |
992 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 |
973 mm |
0 mm |
973 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 |
1,318 mm |
0 mm |
1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 |
1,275 mm |
0 mm |
1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 |
958 mm |
0 mm |
958 mm |
Total Legroom |
2,995 mm (over 3 rows) |
2,060 mm (over 2 rows) |
0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum |
527 L |
895 L |
-368 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 |
1,557 L |
31.6 |
-30.6 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum |
3,067 L |
1,809 L |
2 L |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Ford Expedition
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2009 Ford Expedition.
Be the first!
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 GMC Terrain
2013 |
The GMC Terrain's long wheelbase also pays off with noticeably more rear seat leg room than in competitors. In fact, there's a little more combined legroom in the first two rows than in the far larger Yukon XL, and a few more inches than in the larger Acadia. Sound like enough space to fit a third row? Perhaps, but GM opted not to offer one. The Terrain is thoroughly compact in width. The larger GMCs remain much better options for transporting three adults in the back seat. They're also better for carrying cargo. The Terrain's cargo floor is long, but its also high and narrow, and the second-row seats don't fold flat.
see full GMC Terrain review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 GMC Terrain
2015 |
4dr SUV 301-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The rear seat room is plentiful, and because rear seat can be slid forward and back, you can shift between needing more leg room and using more of the cargo area. We had traded in a 2015 Dodge Journey for the Terrain, because of safety concerns, but realized after we had it for awhile, the rear seat of the Journey was not able to go back far enough into the cargo area, and because of the bulky and high mounted head rests, you felt trapped. The Terrain does not have these issues and feels much more roomy and comfortable. The rear seats are supportive and not at all like some back seats that feel like they were an afterthought.
see full GMC Terrain review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all
Ford models.