Model Year | 2016 | 2011 | |
Model | Ford Expedition | Honda Ridgeline | |
Engine | turbocharged 3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 272 kW@5000 569 Nm@2500 |
3.5L V6 OHC-4v 186 kW@5700 335 Nm@4300 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 5-speed automatic | |
Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUT | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 3,023 mm | 3,099 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 5,245 mm | 5,253 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 2,002 mm | 1,938 mm | 1 mm |
Height | 1,961 mm | 1,786 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,517 kg | 2,043 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 106 L | 83 L | 23 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,006 mm | 1,034 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,605 mm | 1,605 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,506 mm | 1,463 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,044 mm | 1,036 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,011 mm | 993 mm | -992 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,618 mm | 1,590 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,521 mm | 1,453 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 993 mm | 925 mm | 68 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 973 mm | 0 mm | 973 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,318 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,275 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 958 mm | 0 mm | 958 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,995 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,961 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 527 L | 0.0 | 527 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,557 L | 0.0 | 1 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,067 L | 0.0 | 3 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Expedition.
2011 Honda Ridgeline Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
I too love that the rearseats can both flip up. This offers me alot of rear floor space to haul my music gear instead of laying it out on the rear bed area. see full Honda Ridgeline review |
2010 | 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
The interior is the Ridgelines stronges point. Comfortable front and back and a feeling a space. The lack of transmission tunnel and column mounted shifter in particular make the front cabin roomy. see full Honda Ridgeline review |