| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Ford Expedition and 2010 Toyota Matrix Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2010 | |
| Model | Ford Expedition | Toyota Matrix | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,023 mm | 2,601 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,245 mm | 4,366 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 2,002 mm | 1,765 mm | 1 mm |
| Height | 1,961 mm | 1,560 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,530 kg | 1,300 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 106 L | 50 L | 56 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,006 mm | 1,029 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,605 mm | 1,354 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,529 mm | 1,328 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,044 mm | 1,057 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,011 mm | 998 mm | -997 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,618 mm | 1,336 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,521 mm | 1,110 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 993 mm | 919 mm | 74 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 973 mm | 0 mm | 973 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,318 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,275 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 958 mm | 0 mm | 958 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,995 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,976 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 527 L | 561 L | -34 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,557 L | 19.8 | -18.8 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,067 L | 1,741 L | 2 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Expedition
| 2013 Ford Expedition Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2014 | 0 | The driven Limited trim had black heated and cooled front seats. The cooling was necessary in the summertime Texas heat and perfomed well - I turned them on every time I got in the car (unlike the Lexus system, that you can leave on as it is a dial, you have to activate the cooling every single time you restart the car). These thrones were comfortable for a 4 hour drive - there was more room for someone who has more girth than I. Also, adjustable pedals are a great Ford innovation that I wish more manufacturers would include. My wife (who is 11 inches shorter than me) could easily drive this beast comfortably, without sitting too close to the steering wheel. see full Ford Expedition review |
| 2014 | 0 | Both the second and third rows have ample room, with and without kid's car seats, for three across. The third row isn't an afterthought like in other SUVs and even 5'11" adults are happy back there. Additionally, the vents provide adequate AC in 100+ degree heat. There are plenty of easily accessible LATCH anchors if you wish (although seatbelts are generally just as easy and have a higher weight rating with car seats than the LATCH anchors). Most minivans (except the Odyssey) do not have LATCH in the center of the second row - only on the outboard - and only have LATCH in the center of the third row. The Expedition (and Odyssey) is nice because they are flexible where you can put car seats comfortably. see full Ford Expedition review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota Matrix
| 2010 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat for a tall large guy is terrible this is why i got a BMW instead 2 years ago, my wife is using the Toyota see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2010 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
The front seat is not rally confortable for a big 6foot 300 pound guy. I have long torso and some time get back pain in the middle after long driving... see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat are horrible for an "high end" class (XRS) car ...
I considered getting rid of the car due to back pain, but my wife is using it now, I got a BMW
see full Toyota Matrix review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
