| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Ford Expedition and 2016 Volvo V60 Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2016 | |
| Model | Ford Expedition | Volvo V60 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Wagon | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 119.0 in | 109.3 in | 9.7 in |
| Length | 205.8 in | 182.5 in | 23.3 in |
| Width | 78.7 in | 73.4 in | 5.3 in |
| Height | 76.7 in | 58.4 in | 18.3 in |
| Curb Weight | 5352 lb. | 3527 lb. | 1825 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 28.0 gal. | 17.8 gal. | 10.2 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.7 in | 38.7 in | 1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 63.4 in | 57.0 in | 6.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 63.0 in | 54.9 in | 8.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.2 in | 41.9 in | -0.7 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.8 in | 37.4 in | 2.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 64.3 in | 55.2 in | 9.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 62.4 in | 53.5 in | 8.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 38.7 in | 33.5 in | 5.2 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 38.2 in | 0.0 in | 38.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 60.1 in | 0.0 in | 60.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 54.5 in | 0.0 in | 54.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 36.3 in | 0.0 in | 36.3 in |
| Total Legroom | 116.2 in (over 3 rows) | 75.4 in (over 2 rows) | 40.8 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 20.7 ft3 | 15.2 ft3 | 5.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 60.9 ft3 | 15.2 | 45.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 110.5 ft3 | 43.8 ft3 | 66.7 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Ford Expedition
| 2006 Ford Expedition Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Plenty of leg room in 2nd and 3rd row. see full Ford Expedition review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
room to get comfortable on long trips; e-z access to coffee, my phone, my wallet; birds-eye view of the road see full Ford Expedition review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Like sitting in your favorite easy chair in your living room. see full Ford Expedition review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Plenty of space for larger people and lots of space between front passenger and driver. see full Ford Expedition review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Can fit two adults and a car seat in the second row seat. Third row is just as comfortable. see full Ford Expedition review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Lots of leg room! see full Ford Expedition review |
| 2006 Ford Expedition Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV, ext. 300-horsepower 5.4L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Hard and flat. see full Ford Expedition review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Volvo V60
| 2016 Volvo V60 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | The V60's interior doesn't only look comfortable. Even back in the day Volvo's cars weren't known only for safety. Many people considered their seats the best. Many still do. The V60's front seats are much cushier than those in a German car, but they are also properly supportive. One caveat. Locate the headrest to receive top scores from the crash test dummy and it will jut too far forward for people with especially upright postures--like me. "Active headrests" that move forward if and when the car is rear-ended can sidestep this tradeoff. But the V60's active headrests do not. The BMW's seats are much firmer, but their headrests have a fore-aft adjustment. You also sit significantly lower in the BMW, but its instrument panel isn't as deep (owing to its windshield being more upright), for a more open view forward. Your build and impressions of either car's seats may vary. see full Volvo V60 review | |
| 2016 Volvo V60 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Volvo V60's rear seat space also lags the BMW's. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a couple inches to spare, but subjectively the limited space seems even tighter than it is. The side window outline that appears sexy from the outside can seem confining from the inside. Large front seat headrests block the view forward. Behind a tall driver even adults of modest size will feel cramped, if they can fit at all. The BMW wagon has a little less headroom but a couple more inches of much-needed knee room. Also, while the Volvo's cabin is a couple inches wider than the BMW's up front, and feels much roomier as a result, this advantage disappears in back. see full Volvo V60 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Volvo V60
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Volvo V60.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
