| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Ford Mustang and 2016 Volvo V60 Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2016 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Volvo V60 | |
| Engine | 4.6L V8 OHC-2v 300 hp@5750 320 lb-ft@4500 |
turbocharged 3.0L I6 DOHC-4v 325 hp@6500 354 lb-ft@3000 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | |
| Body | 2dr Convertible | 4dr Wagon | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.1 in | 109.3 in | -2.2 in |
| Length | 187.6 in | 182.5 in | 5.1 in |
| Width | 73.9 in | 73.4 in | 0.5 in |
| Height | 55.7 in | 58.4 in | -2.7 in |
| Curb Weight | 3628 lb. | 3790 lb. | -162 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 17.8 gal. | -1.8 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.8 in | 38.7 in | 0.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.4 in | 57.0 in | -1.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.6 in | 54.9 in | -1.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.7 in | 41.9 in | 0.8 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 36.3 in | 37.4 in | -1.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 45.0 in | 55.2 in | -10.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 45.2 in | 53.5 in | -8.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 30.3 in | 33.5 in | -3.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 73 in (over 2 rows) | 75.4 in (over 2 rows) | -2.4 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 9.7 ft3 | 15.2 ft3 | -5.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 9.7 ft3 | 43.8 ft3 | -34.1 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Ford Mustang
| 2006 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
seat is comfortable can be adjusted to suit your choice of position all controls are within easy reach see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Driving position is very flexible, all the controls are within reach and easy to use. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Plenty of leg room for tall people like me. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2006 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
While our present government may blow off the standards & principles of the Geneva Convention, I still find them worthy enough to abide. Mustang rear seats are in clear violation. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
The Mustang is a cool car, but nowhere near as comfortable see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
Not much room in the back of a Mustang... see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is small for adults. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
Rear seat is for kids. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
Rear seats in name only. No real passenger room see full Ford Mustang review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Volvo V60
| 2016 Volvo V60 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | The V60's interior doesn't only look comfortable. Even back in the day Volvo's cars weren't known only for safety. Many people considered their seats the best. Many still do. The V60's front seats are much cushier than those in a German car, but they are also properly supportive. One caveat. Locate the headrest to receive top scores from the crash test dummy and it will jut too far forward for people with especially upright postures--like me. "Active headrests" that move forward if and when the car is rear-ended can sidestep this tradeoff. But the V60's active headrests do not. The BMW's seats are much firmer, but their headrests have a fore-aft adjustment. You also sit significantly lower in the BMW, but its instrument panel isn't as deep (owing to its windshield being more upright), for a more open view forward. Your build and impressions of either car's seats may vary. see full Volvo V60 review | |
| 2016 Volvo V60 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Volvo V60's rear seat space also lags the BMW's. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a couple inches to spare, but subjectively the limited space seems even tighter than it is. The side window outline that appears sexy from the outside can seem confining from the inside. Large front seat headrests block the view forward. Behind a tall driver even adults of modest size will feel cramped, if they can fit at all. The BMW wagon has a little less headroom but a couple more inches of much-needed knee room. Also, while the Volvo's cabin is a couple inches wider than the BMW's up front, and feels much roomier as a result, this advantage disappears in back. see full Volvo V60 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Volvo V60
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Volvo V60.
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
