| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Ford *Explorer Sport Trac and 2010 Dodge Dakota Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2010 | |
| Model | Ford *Explorer Sport Trac | Dodge Dakota | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Ford *Explorer Sport Trac
| 2006 Ford *Explorer Sport Trac Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUT 292-horsepower 4.6L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
The seats are much improved over older explorers. You can ride for 4 hours and not feel tired when you get out of the truck. I have heated leather, which I recommend. The heat is in the lumbar, as well as seat bottom. Very nice seats. see full Ford *Explorer Sport Trac review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Dodge Dakota
| 2010 Dodge Dakota Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 302-horsepower 4.7L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Cheap, cramped and very uncomfortable. see full Dodge Dakota review |
| 2010 | 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 302-horsepower 4.7L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Passengers noticed very cramped in comparison to the Ridgleine see full Dodge Dakota review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUTs
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
