| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2020 Ford Explorer and 2013 Dodge Durango Specifications
| Model Year | 2020 | 2013 | |
| Model | Ford Explorer | Dodge Durango | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,025 mm | 3,043 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 5,050 mm | 5,075 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 2,004 mm | 1,925 mm | 1 mm |
| Height | 1,775 mm | 1,801 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,971 kg | 2,157 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 68 L | 93 L | -25 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,034 mm | 1,013 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,570 mm | 1,486 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,504 mm | 1,448 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,074 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,029 mm | 1,011 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,572 mm | 1,481 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,501 mm | 1,422 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 980 mm | 11 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 988 mm | 960 mm | 28 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,387 mm | 1,280 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,039 mm | 1,087 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 818 mm | 800 mm | 18 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,883 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,804 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 515 L | 487 L | 28 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,356 L | 1,351 L | 0 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,486 L | 2,393 L | 0 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2020 Ford Explorer
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Ford Explorer.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Dodge Durango
| 2013 Dodge Durango Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2014 | The Durango's relatively narrow width, a plus for handling, has the opposite impact on interior room. These are very much two sides of the same coin. Because the Durango's cabin isn't terribly wide it feels more agile than wider SUVs. But three passengers in the second row don't have as much space to spread out--those in a Nissan Pathfinder enjoy a couple more inches of shoulder room--and only two people can sit in the third row. (The Honda Pilot, Toyota Highlander, and GM's large crossovers all have three belts back there.) Leg room in the Durango is much more competitive, but still a few inches short of class leading. This said, comfort isn't only a matter of interior dimensions. Both of the Durango's rear rows are well-upholstered and positioned higher off the floor than the three-row crossover norm. This benefits both thigh support and outward visibility. The Hyundai Santa Fe isn't far off in this regard, but the Nissan Pathfinder's seats are much closer to the floor, and less hospitable to adults as a result. Among the three, I'd prefer to be a rear seat passenger in the Dodge. Among large conventional SUVs, the Ford Expedition has a more comfortable third row, but the Chevrolet Tahoe (which retains a live rear axle despite a comprehensive redesign for the 2015 model year) doesn't come close. And the foot-shorter 4Runner? Its XXS third-row seat is best saved for emergencies. On the other side of the ledger, the Durango does have a higher floor than the typical car-based crossover. Getting in and out isn't as easy. This vies with curb weight as the top disadvantage of the Durango's conventional SUV configuration. see full Dodge Durango review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Dodge Durango
| 2013 Dodge Durango Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 290-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
There was very little bolstering on the sides of the seat bottoms. I was not able to find a comfortable seating position in the Durango see full Dodge Durango review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
