| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2007 Ford Explorer and 2015 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2007 | 2015 | |
| Model | Ford Explorer | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,888 mm | 2,720 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,912 mm | 4,783 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,872 mm | 1,915 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,849 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,014 kg | 1,599 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 85 L | 61 L | 24 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,011 mm | 955 mm | -954 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,499 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,407 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,067 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 983 mm | 884 mm | 99 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,496 mm | 1,326 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,410 mm | 1,204 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 937 mm | 777 mm | 160 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 950 mm | 0 mm | 950 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,349 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,151 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 886 mm | 0 mm | 886 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,901 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 385 L | 382 L | 3 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,243 L | 13.5 | -12.5 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,370 L | 13.5 | -11.5 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Ford Explorer
| 2007 Ford Explorer Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
the front seat has plenty of leg room and seats hug you see full Ford Explorer review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 292-horsepower 4.6L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Have driven from Maryland to Florida and back a couple of times, as well as 3-4 hours trips routinely. Seats are comfortable with no backache and don't have to stop every couple of hours due to fatigue. Could drive and be comfortable all day long. see full Ford Explorer review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
| 2015 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
