Model Year | 2012 | 2004 | |
Model | Ford Flex | Chrysler 300M | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | |||
Difference | |||
Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
2012 Ford Flex Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 355hp 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The seating throughout the vehicle is extremely roomy. Adults can fit comfortably in both the second and third row seats. The driver and passenger seats are also extremely comfortable. see full Ford Flex review |
2004 Chrysler 300M Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2005 | 4dr Sedan 340-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
It was a very comfortable ride. see full Chrysler 300M review |
2005 | 4dr Sedan 340-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Lots of leg room, comfortable seats. see full Chrysler 300M review |
2004 | 4dr Sedan 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Perfect for long drives. Maybe could be a little higher up (we recently rented a Mercury Sable ie Ford Taurus that is higher up & easier for entry/exit). But the seats fit like a glove on the 300M! see full Chrysler 300M review |
2004 Chrysler 300M Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2005 | 4dr Sedan 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Seat cushion provided little support. see full Chrysler 300M review |