Model Year | 2009 | 2013 | |
Model | Ford Flex | Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Engine | 3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 195 kW@6250 336 Nm@4500 |
3.0L V6 OHC-4v 172 kW@6250 291 Nm@3750 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,995 mm | 2,670 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 5,138 mm | 4,641 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 1,928 mm | 1,801 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,717 mm | 1,679 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,132 kg | 1,745 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 73 L | 63 L | 10 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,483 mm | 1,433 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,407 mm | 1,326 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,036 mm | 1,057 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,029 mm | 973 mm | -972 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,450 mm | 1,425 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,397 mm | 1,318 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,125 mm | 935 mm | -934 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 983 mm | 899 mm | 84 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,290 mm | 1,265 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,044 mm | 993 mm | -992 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 848 mm | 704 mm | 144 mm |
Total Legroom | 3,010 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,695 mm (over 3 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 549 L | 422 L | 127 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,274 L | 1,025 L | 0 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,455 L | 2,056 L | 0 L |
2009 Ford Flex Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2010 | 4dr SUV 262-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
Plenty of room in the first and second rows. The third row will fit an adult, but is better for the kids. see full Ford Flex review |
2010 | 4dr SUV 262-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
Tons of rear leg room. Can accommodate basketball players see full Ford Flex review |
2010 | 4dr SUV 262-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
Very comfortable and easy to adjust front seats with good materials, good controls, and sufficient room to stretch out your legs. see full Ford Flex review |
2010 | 4dr SUV 262-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
everything see full Ford Flex review |
2009 | 4dr SUV 262-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
My over 6 foot tall friends absolutely love my Flex because their knees never touch the backs of the front seats. The rear seat is like sitting in a stretch limo. With plenty of cup holders and storage for all to enjoy. see full Ford Flex review |
2009 | 4dr SUV 262-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic AWD |
Extremely comfortable and accomodating see full Ford Flex review |
2009 | 4dr SUV 262-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
The front seats exceptionally comfortable. They are large and supportive. see full Ford Flex review |
2009 | 4dr SUV 262-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
The second row seats have limo class legroom and are sofa comfy. The second row screams road trip. The third row seats are ample for cross town trips for adults (6ft folks will fit) and should be no problems for the smaller ones. see full Ford Flex review |
2009 | 4dr SUV 262-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic AWD |
Multiple seat settings and very comfortable seats. see full Ford Flex review |
2009 | 4dr SUV 262-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic AWD |
Lots of leg room. Comfy seats. Personal headphones are good, too. see full Ford Flex review |
2009 Ford Flex Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2010 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 355hp 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Took awhile to think of something that could be improved but a bit larger area in the front drivers footwell would be appreciated. That's about it. see full Ford Flex review |
2013 Mitsubishi Outlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
There's a reason three-row crossovers tend to be much larger than this pair. The third-row seat in the Kia Sorento doesn't provide enough headroom for the average adult male. Both comfort and knee room are also in short supply. You might think that a seat couldn't get any tighter than the Sorento's third row. But, based on the official specs, the Outlander has nearly four inches less combined legroom--a huge difference. Even children won't fit in the Mitsubishi's third row unless you slide the second row forward much of the way. The 2014's third row seat is at least a conventional seat. Last year it was little more than a sling. In either vehicle the second row split bench is roomy and comfortable, with enough height off the floor to provide adults with good thigh support. But the rear passengers in the Outlander don't get air vents. Those in the Kia do. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander.